Featured

Welcome to our project blog!

Deep History of Sea Country: Climate Sea level and Culture

Funded by Australian Research Council (Discovery Project DP170100812)

Submerged landscape archaeology is an under-researched field in Australia and represents a major opportunity to address knowledge gaps in world prehistory such as early human migrations, the archaeology of land bridges and coastal-hinterland cultural exchange.

 

Deep History of Sea Country Stakeholder Workshop

For most of the 65,000 years or so of occupation in Australia, sea level has been lower than present, yet we know almost nothing about submerged landscapes and their associated cultural heritage. The key to unlocking this unknown potential is through collaborative efforts between different stakeholder and interest groups, maximizing benefits from meaningful collaboration in offshore development activity and allowing for better documentation, management, regulation and discovery of past cultural and other seabed resources.

On 13th March we held a workshop on the Deep History of Sea Country at the University of Western Australia.  The Workshop was aimed at organisations and people working in marine and coastal environments including developers and operators, environmental and heritage consultants, regulators, independent scientists, indigenous groups and other stakeholders.  Each of these ‘interest groups’ have different aims, perspectives and expectations, with a focus ranging from economic to ecological and heritage.

IMG_1327

A series of presentations were given by project team members, which explored the key issues surrounding submerged cultural resources, including what we know, what we need to know and what we need to do to achieve this. Sean McNeair from Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation also gave a presentation on the Indigenous perspectives on Sea Country.  Attendees were given opportunities to discuss their perspectives on data, resource management and policy related to submerged cultural landscapes in northwest Australia.  These discussions were very helpful and we hope to hold another stakeholder workshop in a years’ time.  If you are interested in being invited to this next workshop, please feel free to register your interest with any of the project team members.

In the meantime, we have a forthcoming paper in Ocean and Coastal Management, entitled ‘Recognition and value of submerged prehistoric landscape resources in Australia’, which explores some of these issues.  A link will be added when this becomes available.

image1

Australia’s coastal living is at risk from sea-level rise, but it’s happened before

This article was originally published on The Conversations. Read the original article.

 

With global sea levels expected to rise by up to a metre by 2100 we can learn much from archaeology about how people coped in the past with changes in sea level.

In a study published this week in Quaternary Science Reviews, we looked at how changes in sea level affected different parts of Australia and the impact on people living around the coast.

The study casts new light on how people adapt to rising sea levels of the scale projected to happen in our near future.


Read more: Cave dig shows the earliest Australians enjoyed a coastal lifestyle


Coastal living

More than eight out of every ten Australians live within 50km of the coast.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says global sea levels may increase by more than 8mm/year, four times the average of the last century.

A major challenge for managing such a large increase in sea level is our limited understanding of what impact this scale of change might have on humanity.

While there are excellent online resources to model the local physical impacts of sea level rise, the recent geological past can provide important insights into how humans responded to dramatic increases in sea level.

The last ice age

At the height of the last ice age some 21,000 years ago, not only were the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets larger than they are today, but 3km-high ice sheets covered large parts of North America and northern Europe.

This sucked vast amounts of water out of our planet’s oceans. The practical upshot was sea level was around 125m lower, making the shape of the world’s coastlines distinctly different to today.

As the world lurched out of the last ice age with increasing temperatures, the melting ice returned to the ocean as freshwater, dramatically increasing sea levels and altering the surface of our planet.

Arguably nowhere experienced greater changes than Australia, a continent with a broad continental shelf and a rich archaeological record spanning tens of millennia.

A bigger landmass

For most of human history in Australia, lower sea levels joined mainland Australia to both Tasmania and New Guinea, forming a supercontinent called Sahul. The Gulf of Carpentaria hosted a freshwater lake more than twice the size of Tasmania (about 190,000km2).

Our study shows that lower sea levels resulted in Australia growing by almost 40% during this time – from the current landmass of 7.2 million km2 to 9.8 million km2.

The coastlines also looked very different, with steep profiles off the edge of the exposed continental shelf in many areas forming precipitous slopes and cliffs.

Imagine the current coastline where the Twelve Apostles are on Victoria’s Great Ocean Road and then extend them around much of the continent. Many rivers flowed across the exposed shelf to the then distant coast.

The steep cliffs at the Apostles, off Victoria’s Great Ocean Road, look like parts of the ancient coastline of Australia. Flickr/portengaround, CC BY-SA

When things warmed up

Then between 18,000 and 8,000 years ago, global climate warmed, leading to rapid melting of the ice sheets, and seeing sea levels in the Australian region rising from 125m below to 2m above modern sea levels.

Tasmania was cut off with the flooding of Bass Strait around 11,000 years ago. New Guinea was separated from Australia with the flooding of Torres Strait and creation of the Gulf of Carpentaria around 8,000 years ago.

We found that 2.12 million square km, or 20-29% of the landmass – a size comparable to the state of Queensland – was lost during this inundation. The location of coastlines changed on average by 139km inland. In some areas the change was more than 300km.

Much of this inundation occurred over a 4,000-year period (between 14,600 and 10,600 years ago) initiated by what is called Meltwater Pulse 1A, a period of substantial ice sheet collapse releasing millions of cubic litres of water back into the oceans.

During this period, sea levels rose by 58m, equivalent to 14.5mm per year. On the ground, this would have seen movement of the sea’s edge at a pace of about 20-24m per year.

Impacts of past sea level rise

The potential impacts of these past sea-level changes on Aboriginal populations and societies have long been a subject of speculation by archaeologists and historians.

Map of Australia showing sea-level change and archaeological sites for selected periods between 35,000 and 8,000 years ago. PMSL=Present Mean Sea Level. Sean Ulm, Author provided

In his 1970s book Triumph of the Nomads: A History of Aboriginal Australia, the Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey hypothesised that:

Most tribal groups on the coast 18,000 years ago must have slowly lost their entire territory […] a succession of retreats must have occurred. The slow exodus of refugees, the sorting out of peoples and the struggle for territories probably led to many deaths as well as new alliances.

Archaeologists have long recognised that Aboriginal people would have occupied the now-drowned continental shelves surrounding Australia, but opinions have been divided about the nature of occupation and the significance of sea-level rise. Most have suggested that the ancient coasts were little-used or underpopulated in the past.

Our data show that Aboriginal populations were severely disrupted by sea-level change in many areas. Perhaps surprisingly the initial decrease in sea level prior to the peak of the last ice age resulted in people largely abandoning the coastline, and heading inland, with a number of archaeological sites within the interior becoming established at this time.

Cross-section profiles of the continental shelf at Port Stephens, NSW (top) and Cape Otway, Vic (bottom). PMSL=Present Mean Sea Level. Sean Ulm, Author provided

During the peak of the last ice age, there is evidence on the west coast that shows people continued to use marine resources (shellfish, fish etc) during this time, albeit at low levels.

A shrinking landmass

With the onset of the massive inundation after the end of the last ice age people evacuated the coasts causing markedly increased population densities across Australia (from around 1 person for every 355 square km 20,000 years ago, to 1 person every 147 square km 10,000 years ago).

Rising sea levels had such a profound impact on societies that Aboriginal oral histories from around the length of the Australian coastline preserve details of coastal flooding and the migration of populations.

We argue that this squeezing of people into a landmass 22% smaller – into inland areas that were already occupied – required people to adopt new social, settlement and subsistence strategies. This may have been an important element in the development of the complex geographical and religious landscape that European explorers observed in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Following the stabilisation of the sea level after 8,000 years ago, we start to see the onset of intensive technological investment and manipulation of the landscape (such as fish traps and landscape burning).

We also see the formation of territories (evident by marking of place through rock art) that continues to propagate up until the present time. All signs of more people trying to survive in less space.


Read more: Buried tools and pigments tell a new history of humans in Australia for 65,000 years


So what are the lessons of the past for today? Thankfully, we can show that past societies survived rapid sea level change at rates slightly greater than those projected in our near future, albeit with population densities far lower than today.

But we can also see that sea level rise resulted in drastic changes to where people lived, how they survived, what technology they used, and probable modifications to their social, religious and political ways of life.

In today’s world with substantially higher population densities, managing the relocation of people inland and outside Australia, potentially across national boundaries, may provide to be one of the great social challenges of the 21st century.


Note, this article was amended on Friday 19 January 2018 at the request of the authors to correct the IPCC’s projected rise in global sea levels.

DHSC Project Team: Professor Jorg M. Hacker and Ms. Shakti Chakravarty, Airborne Research Australia and Flinders University

Picture8

This is the airborne component of the DHSC project. We fly our small research aircraft, an ECO- Dimona motorglider (DIMO) custom-built by Diamond Aircraft in Austria for research flying. The aircraft (VH-EOS and its identical sister ship, VH-OBS) are owned and operated by Airborne Research Australia (ARA) in Adelaide. The ARA is a Not-For-Profit Approved Independent Research Institute. Jorg Hacker is the Director and Chief Scientist of ARA, as well as a Professor of Airborne Environmental Research at Flinders University. Shakti is employed by ARA as field assistant, operating the airborne instrumentation and arranging logistics support.

Our “magic carpet” carries a very comprehensive array of sensors – most importantly two state-of-the-art and powerful airborne LiDARs, one for topographic measurements, the other one for bathymetric measurements, with the latter one also capable of seeing dry surfaces over land. The LiDARs are a Riegl Q680-i-S and a Riegl VQ-820-G, funnily enough also manufactured in Austria, so they fit our aircraft perfectly. Each LiDAR has its own top-of-the-range GPS/IMU system mounted to it to determine the position and attitude (pitch and roll angle and heading) at extremely high accuracy (a few cms for the position and altitude and about 1/100th degree for the angles) 200 times per second. If the reader does not know what an airborne LiDAR is, have a read here. The DIMO also carries a Canon EOS 5D DSLR-camera looking downwards and taking images every few seconds, as well as a GoPro video camera. The instrumentation we carry is worth about $1M, so we better are very careful in what we do with it.

In this Blog, I thought it may be interesting to read how we got from Adelaide to the field site in NW-Australia and back home. This journey is quite different from how the rest of the project team gets there – by taking the airline to Karratha. The way to tell the story is through the regular reports I emailed to the DHSC project team – somewhat shortened as not make this Blog too long.

Picture1

Excerpts from our trip journal:

Report #1 sent to the DHSC team on 20 Sep (after flying 750km from Adelaide)

I just wanted to let you know that Shakti and I have left Adelaide this morning for Karratha. The past few days have been very hectic and I think it may well be of interest to you to hear what it means to fly very expensive instrumentation in a small aircraft. As some of you know, we had problems with the bathy lidar on the trip preceding this one (mapping mangroves and fishtraps in the Gulf of Carpentaria for 70 flying hours within 3 weeks between Weipa and Groote Eylandt, based out of Burketown). This is not really surprising, because the way we are flying that LiDAR is rather unusual. Normally these instruments are flown in much larger and air-conditioned aircraft, not in a simple pod under the wing of a motorglider. After our return from this trip (on Thu, 7th Sep), we immediately attempted to rectify the problem.  With great assistance from Riegl, we have (hopefully) repaired the bathy lidar (treating it with due care) and proved that it works again during a (short) testflight yesterday. The topo lidar had worked perfectly during the Gulf of Carpentaria trip generating more than 3TB of raw data.

Next, we had to do a “quick” change of aircraft. The plan was to perform a 100-hourly maintenance inspection on the same aircraft (VH-OBS) that we used in the Gulf of Carpentaria where it performed flawlessly. However, when we started the inspection, we detected a small fault in its engine which needed to be rectified before flying thousands of kilometers through remote Australia (again) and then being based about 3,000km away from our facilities in Adelaide. To deal with this fault will take about a week, so we decided to transfer the instrumentation to our other aircraft (VH-EOS) – about a 2-day job. And this is what we are flying today.

Report #2 sent to the DHSC team on 22 Sep (after flying 2,100km from Coober Pedy to Broome)

We have now arrived at Broome, our last stop before the final section of the ferry flight planned for tomorrow (from Broome to Karratha, about 650km following the coastline to the WSW).

This trip again illustrated what one faces when ferrying a small research aircraft from the south coast to the north coast of Australia. The flight from Adelaide to Coober Pedy (Australia’s premiere Opal town) was relatively eventless (on the 20th), flying at around 8,500ft into a headwind of sometimes up to 25 knots. In Coober Pedy, we stayed in a nice motel that is constructed in the same way as our own house in the Adelaide hills, the Mud Hut Motel. The people there took the trouble to drive us with our jerry cans twice to the main service station in town, so that we could fill up our tank with Premium Unleaded Petrol. Good.

The next stage of the ferry flight (on the 21st) again required struggling with strong headwinds, so that it took 4.5 hours to reach Alice Springs. The visibility was not great, because there was a lot of smoke and dust in the air. Air Traffic Control in Alice Springs gave us a bit of a “run-around” on arrival, but we arrived safely finding the air temperature at 37deg C – everybody said this is unusual for this time of the year. We refuelled and after having a bit of “fun” starting our engine due to the heat, we were ready for take-off for the next sector – to a cattle station on the edge of the Tanami Desert, Vaughan Springs, also known at Mount Doreen Station. Taking off with a fully laden Dimona in this heat is an interesting “balancing act”. The engine only develops 115HP to lift off an aeroplane weighing 930kg – and that for 5 minutes maximum only. After that it is back to 90HP or less. The engine also gets rather hot during a slow climbing flight, so one needs to be quite carefully monitoring the oil and water temperatures. The Tower was friendly enough to give us the  full length of the 3km runway at Alice Springs and when we were very slowly climbing out to the West and hit a thermal at low altitude, they allowed us to circle in this thermal, this way gaining height rather quickly until we reached our cruising altitude of 8,500ft.

The Dimona has so far behaved extremely well giving us no trouble at all. I hope it stays like this.

The plan is to arrive tomorrow in the early afternoon at Karratha and establish ourselves there. Sunday we have planned a day off to start the campaign with a first data capture flight on Monday. I haven’t checked the tides yet….

Report #3 sent to the DHSC team on 23 September:

We made it to Karratha today!

The aircraft is safely tied down, with the nose pointing into the strong wind that slowed us down considerably on our flight from Broome today. This also means that we had strong headwinds for just about the whole 3,500km long ferry flight. Tomorrow we will have a day off and then do the first flight on Monday.

Report #4 sent to the DHSC team on 3 Oct:

This is just to report to you that we have completed all flying here at Karratha. And I can report that everything worked 100%.

I attach an image showing all flightlines for which we have topographic and bathymetric lidar (except the very dense pattern over Enderby and the small dense one directly over Goodwyn Island, where we have very high resolution topographic lidar only. For all of these lines, there are also high resolution RGB-images taken every 4 seconds (approximately 11,000 of them). You will have to look at each one of them ! And we have also really nice GoPro footing for all flights looking vertically down plus several hundred oblique photos out of the window of the aircraft.

The bottom line is – we have collected 2.5TB of raw data.

Picture2

Report #5 sent to the DHSC team on 5 Oct:

Originally we had planned to fly that task today in the afternoon, but decided that the wind may be friendlier tomorrow morning. So instead we went to one of the beaches looking west across Ningaloo Reef. And there we were presented with a most amazing sight: mating turtles in the surf about 20m from the water’s edge.

Report #6 sent to the DHSC team on 8 Oct:

On the 7th Oct, we laser-scanned the coastline and some underwater areas near Coral Bay, then re-fuelled at Carnarvon before continuing along the coast. Further South, we flew over Hamelin Pool and laser scanned (and photographed) the Stromatolites (I guess everybody knows them…). We re-fuelled and overnighted in Geraldton and then proceeded in rather bad weather to Kalgoorlie. The closer we came to Kalgoorlie, the better the weather became. But not only that – for the first time for the whole trip, we actually encountered better and better tailwinds – a sign of what coming tomorrow on the last leg home.

And his evening we arrived back in Adelaide. We had an incredibly quick flight from Kalgoorlie to Adelaide, 1,711km in about 7 hours, with only one refuelling stop at Forrest in the Nullarbor. We used just 140 litres of Premium Unleaded petrol. Try this with any other means of transport! The flight was so quick, because we had an ever increasing tailwind of up to nearly 100km/h, flying at 3,000m AGL. The attached photograph was typical for what we saw during the flight.

During the whole trip, we flew 67 hours which equals about 10,000km and it took us 18 days.

Thanks for reading this long Blog – more to come.

Jorg

Picture4

DHSC Project Team: Dr Ingrid Ward and Peter Ross

Watering Cove 3.JPG

Watering Cove

It’s late July, and Peter Ross and I are here joining in the very last field trip at Watering Cove for Murujuga: Dynamics of the Dreaming ARC Linkage project, led by one of our Sea Country CIs, Jo McDonald.  It is another opportunity to familiarise ourselves with the kinds of landscapes and archaeological sites that might have been drowned during the post-glacial transgression.

Watering Cove has great diversity of landscapes – towering boulders and cliffs overlook dune deposits, mangrove and salt flat environments, and wide beaches, seaward of which is an extensive reef limestone platform. At the northern end of Watering Cove, is an ancient eroded dyke on which the majority of rock art is found. This extends right down into the ocean.  We look hopefully for rock art in the shallow waters around the dkye but find nothing. Further south is the wide dry creek above which we are camped.

Watering Cove 2

Peter has already been here a week, helping to excavate the dune deposits. There were a range of midden deposits which have been explored by the team, and at their deepest (over 2m) it would seem likely that these are still only early Holocene in age. When I turn up, some of the team is moving to an inland valley to excavate a dense midden site in an area known as “Old Geos”, named after the many ancient geometric rock art motifs in the surrounding galleries.  The area also hosts a number of stone circle arrangements and some possible standing stones. The surface midden here is Anadara (known to be a late Holocene phenomenon): below this is an older Terebralia (Mangrove species) layer, and below this is an artefacts layer with no shellfish remains.  As is typical, on the last day, in the last spit, Peter finds a horsehoof core – an indication that the earliest occupation of this site may be even older and more complex than initially thought.

These archaeological sites and the landscape features around them, record the changing dynamics of the region. Although the resolution in most sites is coarse, covering millennia rather than centuries, the combined record provides the detail of this change.  In the same way, no single underwater site can reveal the nature of the drowned coastline.  The current archaeological landscapes will provide the critical analogues to guide our underwater explorations.

Watering Cove 1

DHSC Project Team: Professor Mads Kähler Holst, Dr Peter Moe Astrup & Claus Skriver, Moesgaard Museum

Professor Mads Kähler Holst, Executive Director of Moesgaard Museum

Mads Photo 1

For the last 4 years I have been at the Moesgaard Museum involved in defining new strategies for the Danish Maritime Archaeology. As part of a reorganisation of the National Heritage Management, the museum became responsible for the cultural heritage and archaeological investigations in the maritime waters around Jutland, mainland Denmark. From the start, it was evident that the submerged prehistoric landscapes (of the Stone Age) would be our focus. The fact that such a large part of the early prehistoric landscape is submerged together with the inaccessibility makes them incredibly valuable cultural sites. They are often incredibly rich as archaeological deposits and many of them yet to be discovered. In addition, the relatively protected waters and the high organic contents of the marine sediments in the Danish waters mean that we often have an extraordinary preservation of the sites. Bone and wood artefacts that have completely disappeared on dry ground are sometimes fully preserved and have revealed new complex ornaments and technologies. In this way, maritime archaeology in Denmark offers up not only more sites, but discoveries show a completely different side of those early prehistoric cultures compared to what we find by the Archaeology of dry land.

The main challenge is that the scale of the questions we would like to answer often collides with the relatively slow speed and added costs associated with working on underwater investigations. For that reason, we are increasingly trying to find new strategies and methods that will allow us to target our investigations better. The Deep History of Sea Country project is a very important part of this development.

My own background is a PhD in Prehistoric Archaeology from 2004. My research has revolved around several large-scale research excavations mainly from the Bronze and Iron Ages, in the last years particularly wetland sites. In 2014 I became Professor of Archaeological Methods at Aarhus University and since last year I have been executive director of Moesgaard Museum.

Dr Peter Moe Astrup, Moesgaard Museum, Curator of Maritime Archaeology

Peter Astrup Photo 2

Since 2000 I have been involved in investigations of submerged Stone Age sites and from 2011-2015 this became a central theme in my PhD project “Sea-level changes in Mesolithic southern Scandinavia – Long and short term effects on society and the environment”. In this project, more than 1.200 14C dated sea-level index points (SLIP) were collected from geological and archaeological contexts in order to determine the coastline displacement during the Mesolithic period. In addition by using these models, diving surveys were targeted to clarify the extent to which marine resources were utilized along the Early Mesolithic coastlines.

Peter Astrup Photo 1

Between 2011 and 2016 I have lectured sessionally on the Mesolithic, Coastline modelling and underwater archaeology at Aarhus University and University of Southern Denmark. After completing the PhD project in 2015, I was made a permanent member of staff as Maritime Archaeologist at Moesgaard Museum. Here, I have had the ability to initiate new projects that aims to explore the submerged landscapes/settlements, as well as developing new methods for this purpose. We will be undertaking new and potentially exciting developments within the DHSC project that we hope will also be applicable outside of Denmark, and contribute positively to World Archaeology and Maritime Archaeology on an international scale.

Claus Skriver, Moesgaard Museum, Curator of Maritime Archaeology

Claus Photo 1

I completed my Masters in Prehistoric and Medieval Archeology at Aarhus University in 1999, with my thesis on a use-wear study of lithic material from the Neolithic. Since then I have been employed at Moesgaard Museum as a specialist in Maritime Archaeology, where I have led numerous field and lab-based projects. In 2003 I received my professional diver certificate and together with conservator, the late Jesper Frederiksen, we started the Maritime Archeology research program at Moesgaard in 2004. Since that time, we have developed the program which now includes maritime responsibilities for the waters along the Jutland Coast and the Inland Lakes. Our facilities include all of the equipment needed to undertake survey, recording, excavation and conservation of underwater archaeological material.

I am an underwater archaeologists and curator, and my daily work is Cultural Heritage Management both on Land and Sea. I also am responsible for the cooperation between the three maritime museums in Jutland. Since the beginning of the excavation on Hjarnø Sund site in 2010 I have been the lead investigator for the field campaigns and overall project including fundraising and planning. The initial work at Hjarnø was started in 2010, when significant erosion of the site was first observed. In order to collect as much archaeological material as possible before it was lost, we began a research program that focused on the preservation of organic materials, especially botanical and zoological data in addition to archaeological artefacts that might be present in inundated shellmiddens and layer of Gytja. To maintain consistency in field methods and research focus over the coming years, I am participating in the research at Hjarnø with the DHSC project which we hope will build on the existing work and provide new and important archaeological data.

moesgaard-museum-close-up-of-the-roof-photo-moesgaard-museum

DHSC Project Team: Francis Stankiewicz, Flinders University

F1

My interests have always revolved around a love for the ocean, the arts and archaeology. As an undergraduate at Coastal Carolina University (USA), I majored in marine science with two minors, coastal geology and art history. I became interested in how geophysical techniques could add a new dimension to studying marine environments in support of marine geological and maritime archaeological research. In particular, I became interested in prehistory and the environmental influences that affected early cultures. At the moment, I’m working as a marine geologist in Florida while I do my MA in maritime archeology through Flinders. Luckily, modern day technology allows external students to stay in close communication with fellow researchers, which is important.

F2

The research team here in Denmark is extraordinary; it’s made up of everything from geomorphologists and geoarchaeologists to coastal prehistorians and specialists in Ertebølle culture. Along with Dr Paul Baggley (CTO at Wessex Archaeology and Adjunct Lecturer in Maritime Archaeology at Flinders), my job is to run the geophysical equipment (sidescan sonar and a sub-bottom profiler) which will give us a better understanding of the site’s submerged surface and subsurface. Although Horsens Fjord is protected on all sides from major weather events, which gives the appearance of calm waters, undertaking work on the site has proven to be a challenge. Weather and sea conditions have not been particularly favorable; certainly not ideal for geophysical or diving operations. As we ran our survey, we had to dodge boulders hidden just below the water’s surface while making sure we didn’t run aground in the shallower waters. As with all research, you persist and we were able to collect great data in the end.

F3

After completion of the geophysical operations, I joined the scientific dive team. We excavated the midden in one meter increments, carefully sifting through the material for further analysis. Now the real fun begins: data processing and writing. It’s going to be a big job. The geophysical data will be processed and interpreted based on its returned signals and ground truthed samples (geological samples) collected by other members of the Deep History of Sea Country (DHSC) project team Dr. Ingrid Ward and Peter Ross, as well as scientists at Moesgaard Museum. In terms of the environmental analysis from the site, the geophysical survey, aerial survey, geotechnical data and excavations will be used in combined efforts for further interpretations, we should know by the end of the year what we got.

____

As the months progress over this next year, we will work to finalize our data findings in support of next season’s field operations. It is an exciting venture to view the archaeological information as the site reveals itself with further data analysis. I look forward to working with the DHSC research team next season to dig further into the wealth of knowledge which still lays submerged beneath the sea’s surface.
F4

DHSC Project Team: Peter Ross, Flinders University, PhD Candidate

Having completed my Masters in Maritime Archaeology at Flinders in 2009, I began as a PhD candidate for the Deep History of Sea Country project in March of this year. In between, I’ve been working in cultural heritage management in my home country of Canada, with occasional forays into research-based digs in Europe. My particular interest is to study the formation, degradation, and erosion of archaeological features that have been subjected to one or more episodes of sea-level transgression. Understanding the effects of these phenomena will help allow us to identify archaeological features during underwater investigations in Australia.

PR1a

I am in Denmark to help excavate a transgressed shell midden on the island of Hjarnø, and to study whether analyses of associated lithic materials could aid in that interpretation. Denmark is known for its approximately 500 shell middens from the Mesolithic period, and about the same number from the Neolithic. During the week prior to our excavation I visited some of the documented shell midden sites throughout Jutland in an attempt to get an idea of how these massive archaeological features might react to transgression. Of course, I also found time to visit the incredible Moesgaard Museum, for a side trip to Silkeborg to view the famous Tollund Man, and to visit numerous ship burials. There is so much amazing archaeology in Denmark, and a great place to study shell middens!

PR2a

My time on Hjarnø has included many tasks. In addition to the excavation of a transgressed shell midden, I’ve been involved with using sidescan sonar for identifying underwater sediments and geology, collecting core samples for more detailed sediment assessment, the seemingly endless collection of photos for building photogrammetry models, geological observations of eroding cliff faces, and archaeological surveys of beach areas.

PR3a

——

We’re going to finish our work on Hjarnø in the next few days, but look forward to our return next year. I’ve decided to stay in Denmark for an extra week though in order to immerse myself in the archaeological library at Mosegaard Museum. Our colleagues at Moesgaard have also invited me to participate in the excavation of a submerged log-boat, dated to around the same time period as the formation of many of the shell middens I’ve been studying.

PR4a